Kin’s Hestia Re 2022-1 cat bond to repay $170m majority of principal back to investors

This content is copyright to www.artemis.bm and should not appear anywhere else, or an infringement has occurred.

Artemis has learned from sources that the vast majority of principal from insurtech Kin’s $175 million Hestia Re Ltd. (Series 2022-1) catastrophe bond is expected to be returned to investors at the upcoming risk period end, while just $5 million will be retained with an extended maturity date to cover any potential loss development.

kin-insurance-logoThe Hestia Re 2022-1 catastrophe bond had been exposed to possible losses due to the impacts of hurricane Ian, the largely Florida storm from later in that year of issuance.

Initially after hurricane Ian’s landfall, given the Florida wind focus of this insurance-linked securities (ILS) transaction and the reinsurance protection it provided to sponsor Kin, the $175 million of Hestia Re 2022-1 cat bond notes had been marked down to bids of less than 10 cents on the dollar on some secondary cat bond sheets.

There was, however, a relatively wide-dispersion in the views taken by secondary cat bond trading desks.

In an update we reported that, after hurricane Ian, some pricing sheets had the Hestia Re 2022-1 notes marked for bids as low as 5 cents on the dollar, others still had them marked only 20% down, while one still held them at a mark of 92.

As we also explained at the time, in October 2022, Kin’s reinsurance from the Florida Hurricane Catastrophe Fund inured to the benefit of these Hestia Re 2022-2 cat bond notes, which effectively lifted their attachment point, on a gross loss basis.

As a result, it was challenging for secondary market broker desks and for us to really understand just how exposed the notes were at that time, which likely drove the wide-dispersion in marks in cat bond pricing sheets at that time.

In early 2023, Kin revealed that it ceded around 97% of its gross losses from hurricanes Ian and Nicole in 2022 to its reinsurance capital partners.

At that time, the Hestia Re 2022-1 cat bond notes were marked down still on pricing sheets, for bids of between 70 and 80.

The pricing of the notes continued to recover over-time, resulting in them being marked down for bids in the low to mid-90’s as recently as the first-quarter of 2025.

However, with the scheduled maturity for these notes due later this month, we’ve now learned that out of the original $175 million of principal from the Hestia Re 2022-1 cat bond notes, the majority is now set to be returned to investors holding them.

We’re making the assumption that hurricane Ian has been the only catastrophe event in the risk period for these notes that was seen as a threat for possible attachment of the cat bonds’ coverage. As Kin’s losses from the 2024 storms Milton and Helene were seen to have far lower impacts on the company.

We’re told by sources that $170 million, so some 97% of the outstanding principal, is now expected to be returned to investors, with just the remaining $5 million now set to face an extension of maturity.

Given the notes are marked below 95 across the majority of pricing sheets we’ve seen, it suggests a return of capital greater than the price suggests, which investors will welcome.

For Kin, this likely means the insurer now has much greater clarity of its potential ultimate loss from hurricane Ian (again, presuming that is the event of relevance), giving it the confidence to return the capital and only extend maturity for a 3% sliver of the outstanding notes.

That extension of $5 million will allow Kin some room to make a recovery still, should its losses creep any higher and attach the Hestia Re 2022-1 catastrophe bond notes.

We understand the remaining $5 million of notes will have their maturity date extended for four years, up to April 2029 and the $170 million is expected to be returned to investors after the final risk period ends later this month.

It seems reasonable to assume Kin will have clarity to make a recovery, or return some more of the principal, in advance of that long extension date.

You can read all about the Hestia Re Ltd. (Series 2022-1) catastrophe bond from Kin and every other cat bond deal issued in our extensive Artemis Deal Directory.

Details of catastrophe bonds facing losses, deemed at risk, or already paid out, can be found in our cat bond losses Deal Directory here.

Kin’s Hestia Re 2022-1 cat bond to repay $170m majority of principal back to investors was published by: www.Artemis.bm
Our catastrophe bond deal directory
Sign up for our free weekly email newsletter here.

Porch complaint against Gallagher Re over Vesttoo fraud dismissed with prejudice

This content is copyright to www.artemis.bm and should not appear anywhere else, or an infringement has occurred.

The lawsuit filed by Porch Group against broker Gallagher Re regarding the Vesttoo reinsurance letter of credit (LOC) collateral fraud has been dismissed with prejudice by the Texas court. But Porch has said it intends to continue to pursue recourse in the matter.

porch-vesttoo-gallagher-re-reinsurancePorch Group is the owner of insurer Homeowners of America Insurance Company (HOA), a company that particularly affected when the Vesttoo reinsurance letter of credit (LOC) collateral fraud caused financial impacts to the firm.

Porch had filed a lawsuit against broking group Arthur J. Gallagher, claiming its reinsurance arm Gallagher Re had “grossly mismanaged” the administration of a reinsurance arrangement subject to collateral posted by Vesttoo that turned out to be fraudulent.

As we later reported, Gallagher responded to the lawsuit and the complaint made by Porch, urging the Texas court to dismiss the petition “in its entirety and with prejudice.”

Porch had then responded, rejecting broker Gallagher’s motion to dismiss the legal case, saying it believed the company had failed to satisfy the obligations of their contract.

In a judgement filed this week, it was “ordered, adjudged, and decreed that this action and all claims by Plaintiff Porch.com, Inc. against Defendant Gallagher Re Inc. are dismissed with prejudice.”

The judgement also decrees, “That Plaintiff take nothing against Defendant; that all relief not granted is denied unless applicable law allows a party to seek some type of postjudgment relief; and that all allowable and reasonable costs are taxed against Plaintiff.”

Referring to arguments made by Gallagher Re in its motion to dismiss the case, the order concludes that the sole breach of contract claim made by Porch against the broker is dismissed with prejudice, while a contact claim against the broker’s parent AJG is denied as moot, as AJG had been voluntarily dismissed from the action.

So closes another chapter in the Vesttoo saga.

In response to an Artemis enquiry to the companies, a Porch spokesperson said, “We will continue to vigorously pursue recourse in this matter, including via all available legal and other processes,” while Gallagher Re declined to comment.

Whether Porch continues to pursue Gallagher Re specifically remains to be seen. But the company is persisting in its efforts to recover more of the value it lost and damages it suffered due to the Vesttoo letter of credit collateral fraud from other avenues.

As a reminder, Porch recently secured a $7.1 million settlement over constructive trust claims with the Vesttoo Creditors Liquidating Trust in relation to so-called constructive trust claims linked to a reinsurance transaction.

The insurer continues to pursue a court case against China Construction Bank, claiming its staff were complicit in the reinsurance collateral fraud, as well.

Read all of our coverage of news related to the fraudulent or forged letter-of-credit (LOC) collateral linked to Vesttoo reinsurance deals.

Porch complaint against Gallagher Re over Vesttoo fraud dismissed with prejudice was published by: www.Artemis.bm
Our catastrophe bond deal directory
Sign up for our free weekly email newsletter here.